🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Costly

According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $17,000 per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare that with what the typical US resident spends. I can name multiple businesses that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When including these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and employer contribution. And, like much of our government's defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank well below many other countries in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.