🔗 Share this article

Imagine the following: a happy the Danish striker wearing Napoli's colors. Next, place it with a dejected Benjamin Sesko sporting United's jersey, appearing like he's missed a sitter. Do not worry locating a real picture of that miss; background information is the enemy. Then, add statistics in a large, comical font. Don't forget some emoticons. Share the image everywhere.

Would you point out that Højlund's tally includes scores in the Champions League while Sesko isn't playing in Europe? Of course not. And will you highlight that four of Højlund's goals were scored versus weaker national sides, or that his national team is far superior to Slovenia and creates many more chances. You run social media for a large outlet, pure engagement is your livelihood, Manchester United are the prime target, and nuance is the thing to avoid.

Thus the wheel of content turns. Your next task is to sift through a lengthy interview with Peter Schmeichel and find the part where he describes the signing of Sesko "strange". There's a bit, where he qualifies his comments by saying, "Nothing negative to say about Benjamin Sesko"... well, cut that. Nobody needs that. Just make sure "strange" and "Sesko" are paired in the title. People will be furious.

The Season of Potential and Hasty Opinions

The heart of fall has long been one of my preferred periods to observe football. Leaves fall, winds shift, squads and strategies are still fresh, all is novel and yet patterns are emerging. Key players of the coming months are staking their claims. The summer market is shut. Nobody is talking about the multiple trophies yet. Everyone are still in the game. Right now, anything is possible.

Yet, for many of the same reasons, mid-autumn has long been one of my most disliked times to read about football. Because although nothing has yet been settled, something must always be getting settled. Jack Grealish is resurgent. The German talent has been a crushing disappointment. Could Semenyo be the top performer in the league at this moment? Please a decision immediately.

Sesko as The Prime Example

And for numerous reasons, Benjamin Sesko feels like the archetype in this respect, a player caught between football's opposing, non-negotiable forces. The imperative to withhold definitive judgment, allowing layers of technical texture and strategic understanding to mature. And the imperative to generate instant definitive judgment, a conveyor belt of takes and memes, out-of-context criticisms and pointless contrasts, a puzzle that can never truly be solved.

I do not propose to offer a in-depth analysis of Sesko's time at United so far. He has started four times in the top flight in a highly unpredictable team, scored two goals, and taken a grand total of 116 contacts with the ball. What exactly are we analysing? Nor do I propose to replicate the pundits' seminal masterwork "The Sesko Debate", in which two famous analysts duel passionately on a popular show over whether Sesko needs 10 goals to be a success this year (Neville), or whether it's really more like twelve or thirteen (Wright).

A Harsh Reality

For all this I enjoyed watching him at his former club: a big, fast racing car of a forward, playing in a team pitched perfectly to his abilities: afforded the freedom to rampage but also the freedom to fail. Partly this is why Manchester United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be at the moment: a place where "harsh judgments" are summarily issued in about the time it takes to load a pre-roll ad, the club with the widest and most pitiless gulf between the patience and space he needs, and the time and air he is going to get.

We saw a case of this over the international break, when a viral chart conveniently informed us that Sesko had been deemed – decisively – the poorest acquisition of the recent market by a poll of 20 agents. And of course, the press are not alone in this. Team social media, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a oddly high number of pornbot followers: everybody with a vested interest is now essentially aligned along the identical rules, an ecosystem deliberately geared for controversy.

The Psychological Toll

Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What are we doing to ourselves? Are we aware, on some level, what this endless stream of irritation is doing to our brains? Separate from the essential weirdness of playing in the center of it all, knowing on some surreal butterfly-effect level that each aspect about players is now essentially material, commodity, public property to be repackaged and traded.

Indeed, in part this is because it's Manchester United, the entity that keeps nourishing the cycle, a big club that must always be generating the big feelings. But also, in part this is a seasonal affliction, a pendulum of judgment most visibly and harshly observed at this season, about a month after the transfer market shut. Throughout the summer we have been desiring players, praising them, salivating over them. Now, only a handful of games later, many of those same players are already being dismissed as failures. Should we start to worry about a new signing? Did Arsenal actually need their striker necessary? What was the purpose of Randal Kolo Muani?

The Bigger Picture

It feels appropriate that he faces their rivals on the weekend: a team simultaneously 13 months unbeaten at home in the league and yet in their own situation of perceived turmoil, like submitting a missing person’s report on someone who popped to the shops 30 minutes ago. Too open. Their star past his prime. Alexander Isak waste of money. The coach losing his hair.

Maybe we have failed to understand the way the narrative of football has started to replace football itself, to inflect the way we view it, an entire sport reoriented around talking points and reaction, something that occurs in the backdrop while we scroll through our devices, incapable to detach from the constant flow of takes and more takes. Perhaps Sesko bearing the brunt right now. But in a way, everyone is sacrificing something in this process.